Town officials announced last night that a state-ordered redistricting mandate will likely require all of Norwood’s more than 200 town meeting representatives to face election in January, breaking with the traditional staggered system where only one-third of the seats come up for re-election each year.
Furthermore, shifting local demographics and town population growth will expand the size of the town meeting body from 202 to 220 representatives.
Reconciling Imbalanced Districts
Meeting with the town clerk and town counsel, selectmen directed a three-man subcommittee of the district boundaries study committee to draft an immediate proposal realigning the town’s nine districts and six precincts.
Subcommittee member Loftin E. Elvey noted that existing district boundaries have grown “terribly unbalanced” over the past five years—the last time a general election for representatives was held. Some districts currently contain twice the number of registered voters as others, resulting in some districts electing nearly 30 representatives while others elect far fewer.
Under town bylaws, no single district is permitted to elect more than 30 representatives. Because population shifts necessitate expanding or shrinking district boundaries to achieve equal voter representation, town bylaws mandate a general election of all town meeting members whenever districts are altered in size.
Tight Deadlines and State Hurdles
Town officials are operating under immense pressure to finalize the plan. Town Counsel Walter A. Gotovich explained that the Massachusetts legislature recently passed a state emergency act giving towns until the end of October to alter their precinct lines to coincide with new district lines based on registered voters.
Earlier in July, the state had refused to allow towns to alter precinct lines ahead of state reapportionment. Without the new emergency legislation, towns faced the cumbersome prospect of voters casting ballots in two separate places—one precinct for state elections and another for local town meeting elections—because certain districts spanned across multiple precincts.
While the total number of nine districts and six precincts will remain unchanged, their internal boundaries and sizes will be adjusted to equalize voter numbers. Officials noted that although some residents may experience changes to their designated polling locations, no voter will be forced to vote across precinct lines.
The district boundaries subcommittee is scheduled to present its formal realignment recommendation to the Board of Selectmen on Monday or Tuesday.
Archival Note: This article has been dynamically reconstructed from the original public record print archives of the Patriot Ledger
More Town Meeting Stories
-
Norwood Voters To Consider Lighting Funds-June 26, 1968

The Finance Commission backs the utility expansion alongside a $163,000 sewer construction article, while the town master plan is deferred.
-
Norwood Planners To Postpone Article On Master Plan-June 25, 1968

Planners vote unanimously to defy a Finance Commission veto, taking an eight-thousand-dollar intersection study request straight to town meeting.
-
Norwood Meeting Bill Passes-July 27, 1966

The Massachusetts Legislature passed a bill spearheaded by Rep. William Butters to expand Norwood town meeting membership from 200 to 300.
-
Skating Rink Proposal Going to Town Meeting-This Day in Norwood History-January 31, 1963

The Board of Selectmen Tuesday in a meeting with the Skating Rink Study Committee, initiated steps aimed at preparing an article for the next Special Town Meeting. It is expected that the Town will be asked to appropriate funds for construction of the proposed rink at the Father McAleer playground. The estimated construction cost in…
-
What a Conservation Commission Would Mean-This Day in Norwood History-January 25, 1962

Article 9 of tonight’s Special Town Meeting is to see if the town will vote to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 8C, which authorizes the town to establish a Conservation Commission for the promotion and development of the natural resources and for the protection of watershed resources of the town.…
-
Home Rule vs. The State House-May 1, 1961

The Battle Over Norwood’s Blue Line Salaries The core principle of home rule—the right of a municipality to govern itself without state interference—is not just an abstract concept; it is the battlefield upon which the daily operations of a town are often fought. This fundamental tension was thrust into sharp relief on [Month] [Day], 1994,…
Discover more from Norwood Historical Society
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.




