A state evaluation of Norwood’s Chapter 766 special education program has identified nine areas where the local school program is out of compliance across elementary, junior high, and high school levels.

However, the report also commended the school department for successful implementation and noted that most deficiencies can be corrected for the upcoming school year at minimal cost to taxpayers.

The program audit, conducted by a nine-member state Department of Education team following a two-day visit in February, is a standard evaluation performed every three years in every town across the Commonwealth. The evaluation specifically cited deficiencies in in-service training for regular and special education teachers, as well as shortcomings in the core evaluation process, particularly regarding student records and educational plans.

According to Roderick Smith, director of pupil personnel and Norwood’s 766 administrator, all nine areas will be complied with in September, with many changes already in effect. “Norwood is by far one of the leaders in the 766 program,” Smith stated. School Committee Chairman Richard W. Kief echoed that sentiment, noting that the town “stands proud” of the audit findings and that the report contained “more favorable material in it than derogatory.”

The only cited improvement that could entail a direct expenditure of funds is the requirement to provide paid school department attendants to ride on vehicles transporting three- and four-year-old children receiving special education services—a role previously funded through CETA grants in May. Other corrective measures include drafting formal written in-service training programs, providing clear written notifications to parents regarding their rights in the core evaluation process, refining student educational plans, and revising internal job descriptions to streamline administrative oversight under a single special education administrator.

The audit also praised the district for strengths such as staff and community communication, program flexibility, coordination during student grade transitions, and a strong commitment to mainstreaming special needs students. Commended areas included accessibility modifications at the Oldham School, Prescott School, and Junior High South for physically handicapped students, though the state report explicitly emphasized that Norwood High School must also be made fully accessible to accommodate incoming students with physical disabilities.

The local school committee has 30 days to prepare a formal written response to the report, with Smith coordinating responses for consideration at a scheduled meeting in early September. While the Chapter 766 special education mandate has remained controversial in many municipalities—particularly in light of Norwood’s historical $1.8 million loss in state aid reimbursements (of which roughly $800,000 has since been recouped)—local officials expressed confidence in resolving the audit’s findings promptly. (Reporting by local archives).

Archival Note: This article has been dynamically reconstructed from the original public record print archives of the Patriot Ledger

More…

  • Norwood School Committee Votes to Relocate School Administration Offices-August 1, 1974

    The Norwood School Committee voted 5-2 to relocate central school administration offices to the Winslow School, pending cost estimates from Superintendent Philip O. Coakley.

  • Uncertainty Looms Over Norwood Junior High South Opening Date-July 12, 1974

    After three years of double sessions following a 1971 fire, Norwood officials faced the possibility of further delays for the new Junior High South.

  • Unfinished Junior High To Open On Schedule-July 8, 1974

    Discover the construction history of the $4.5 million Junior High South project in 1974, detailing the challenges faced during the transition from the old Washington Street school.

  • School Board Rejects ‘Floating Principal’ Proposal-July 03, 1974

    The Norwood School Committee held a contentious session on the evening of July 2, 1974, where, following two weeks of deliberation and a lengthy 90-minute executive session, the board voted 5-1 to reject a proposal to create a new administrative position titled “floating principal.“ The concept, initially championed by Committee Member Joseph M. Pentowski, was…

    Silhouettes of students running through shattered walls with arrows labeled growth, population, overcrowding, and expansion in a school-themed comic style
  • School Drop-In Centers Possible In Fall-June 24, 1974

    Citing summer custodial constraints and a lack of air conditioning, town officials vote to survey local youths during the summer to prepare for a fall launch.

    School hallway with blue lockers, wooden floor, sunlight streaming through large windows, and signs for art wing
  • Norwood Sets $38 Tax Rate on Court-Ordered 100% Property Valuation for 1972-August 16, 1972

    Announcing a 1972 tax rate of $38 per $1,000 under a court-ordered 100 percent property valuation, Assessor Chairman James J. Drummey concluded a major reassessment by Cole, Layer and Trumble.

  • Junior High Alternate Estimates Sought-June 25, 1971

    A sharp debate divides Town Manager Walter Blasenak and finance officials over mounting unappropriated architectural fees for Boston design firms.

  • Schools Face Heating Oil Shortage for Upcoming Winter, While Band Camp and Library Art Programs Make Headlines-August 6, 1970

    Superintendent Dr. Philip O. Coakley informed the Norwood School Committee that no companies submitted bids to supply 110,000 gallons of No. 5 heating oil for town schools due to quotas, shortages, and environmental regulations.

  • Bells Are Ringin’-July 3, 1970

    The Norwood School Committee overhauled its student transportation system and faced an $8,000 wave of structural school vandalism in July 1970

    Yellow school bus at Oakwood Elementary School entrance with students walking
  • Almost 50% of Graduates Head To College-July 10, 1969

    The Norwood High School guidance department released a significant report on July 10, 1969, detailing the educational future of the school’s 419 graduates. The data revealed that approximately 45 percent of the class planned to attend four-year colleges that fall, a figure the department noted was likely the highest percentage of four-year institution acceptances in…

    Student holding university acceptance letter among study books and notes


Discover more from Norwood Historical Society

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.