On July 25, 1977, the ongoing struggle for representation in South Norwood resurfaced in the pages of The Patriot Ledger. The neighborhood, long described as “literally the wrong side of the tracks,” had endured decades of feeling overlooked, underrepresented, and politically disconnected from the rest of Norwood. The article detailed how a newly energized group — the District 6 town meeting delegation — was emerging as a potential successor to the once‑active Concerned Citizens of South Norwood, a grassroots organization that had captured public attention the previous year with its intense campaign to clean up local barrooms.

The Concerned Citizens group had been formed to address what residents saw as chronic problems with certain South Norwood barrooms — noise, disturbances, after‑hours activity, and lax enforcement. The group’s activism had been loud, persistent, and often confrontational. But by mid‑1977, the organization had become “more or less defunct,” its momentum lost as it narrowed itself to a single issue. Former members now hoped that the District 6 town meeting delegation, which included several veterans of the barroom crusade, could evolve into a broader, more stable voice for the neighborhood.

One of those veterans was Shirley A. Reardon of 15 St. James Avenue, who believed District 6’s town meeting association should adopt the same mission the Concerned Citizens once held: “The whole idea is to upgrade District 6 and restore it so it’s in the same trend as the rest of the town.” Reardon expressed a sentiment widely shared among South Norwood residents: “We seem to be a section that’s forgotten.” She argued that the Concerned Citizens had been worthwhile because “finally people from South Norwood are speaking out, saying ‘Hey, listen, you’ve got to hear us.’”

Another former participant, Monica Phillips Bartell of 14 Austin Street, agreed that the Concerned Citizens had become “singularly motivated,” focusing too narrowly on barroom complaints. She was cautiously optimistic about the District 6 organization, but warned that if it failed to broaden its mission, “it will fall by the wayside as many groups that have surfaced over the years.” Bartell was encouraged by the turnout at the recent District 6 meeting — the second of the year — where all but three or four of the 17‑member delegation attended. She believed the group could become “the truly representative voice” South Norwood needed.

Bartell emphasized that South Norwood’s town meeting members had not met regularly “for maybe 10 years,” not since the death of Selectman John ‘Alec’ Abdallah, a figure remembered for his deep involvement in the neighborhood. She described South Norwood — “Nestled between Morse Hill and Subway Hill, The Flats” — as a place long viewed as the wrong side of the tracks. For the District 6 association to succeed, she said, members must “really listen to our constituents and help make them comfortable to call on us.”

Another key figure from the earlier movement was Karen L. Elias of 14 St. George Avenue, who had served as the chief spokesman for the Concerned Citizens during numerous public hearings. Elias acknowledged that the group had been “less than an unqualified success,” noting that “we still have the problems and a lot of neighbors who want to get involved.” She believed the group had at least proven that “people can really do something,” even if the work was exhausting: “It’s wearing on your nerves and there are times when there are other things you might rather be doing. But if you put enough energy into it at least you can do something.”

Elias was not optimistic that the District 6 association would succeed, pointing out that some of its members “were not around last season when Concerned Citizens could have used support.” She also noted that improvements in police response to barroom issues had been “just marginal,” and that two barrooms remained troublesome — though she declined to name them.

Still, she wished the new delegation well: “Anything that’s going to make South Norwood better.”

The article concluded with a reminder that community news could be phoned in to local correspondents, including Marion Earley for Norwood, underscoring the importance of communication and civic engagement — the very issues at the heart of South Norwood’s struggle for a stronger voice.

Archival Note: This article has been dynamically reconstructed from the original public record print archives of the Patriot Ledger

More…

  • Poll: Why is South Norwood Called the Flats?

    Why Is South Norwood Called “The Flats”?

  • Town Seeks Funding for South Norwood Rehabilitation-January 19, 2010

    Norwood is set to apply for a $1 million grant from the state, with a focus on repairing five roads in South Norwood. During a recent meeting, the Selectmen granted permission to the Department of Community Planning and the Economic Development Committee to seek a grant from the state Department of Housing and Community Development.…

  • South Norwood Business Task Force Launches Ambitious Revitalization and Beautification Plan-July 23, 1993

    Back in July 1993, local business owners and residents in South Norwood were dreaming big about transforming Washington Street into a vibrant, bustling destination complete with outdoor cafes and colorful awnings!

  • New Quarters For Italian Social Club-This Day in Norwood History-May 11, 1961

    The Norwood Italian Social Club has officially moved into its newly renovated home at 1199 Washington Street, marking an important milestone for one of the town’s most active social organizations. President Patrick Long and his committee successfully completed the alterations in time to host the club’s regular monthly membership meeting this past week. At the…


Discover more from Norwood Historical Society

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.