Voting 3 to 2, the Elementary School Building Committee decided last night to recommend constructing an eight-room addition to the Cleveland School rather than pursuing a brand-new school building. Two of the seven committee members present abstained from the vote.

The committee also agreed to convene with Superintendent of Schools Philip O. Coakley and the School Committee at Norwood Town Hall on Thursday evening, September 19. Committee member Jean R. Brown recommended scheduling the meeting for mid-September so the committee could review “actual, room-by-room statistics of enrollment at the Oldham School.” Mrs. Brown, alongside committee members Joseph Wall and John A. Abdallah, voted in favor of proposing the Cleveland School addition. Chairman Arthur B. Rodgers and member Joseph R. Olshan voted against the motion, while Grafton J. Corbett and Paul M. Murphy abstained.

Corbett stated he felt the committee could not make a definitive recommendation until after conferring with school officials, and Murphy noted he had heard that the School Committee and Superintendent Coakley opposed additions because they “would upset the curriculum.” “As far as I’m concerned, this certainly isn’t enough information for me to go on. We’re paying the superintendent good money, we should listen to what he has to say,” Murphy argued.

Conversely, Wall insisted that enrollment statistics supported an eight-room addition and argued that the committee needed to take a firm stance before meeting with school administrators. “We have to have a point to begin with when we meet with Mr. Coakley and the School Committee,” Abdallah added in seconding Wall’s recommendation. Wall further noted that the Balch School, comprising 20 rooms, had operated efficiently, prompting Abdallah to remark, “Any principal that can’t handle an additional eight classrooms ought to resign.” Wall also recalled that when the Prescott and Cleveland schools were originally built, town officials indicated they were engineered to allow for vertical or horizontal expansion if necessary.

However, Chairman Rodgers maintained his conviction that a new elementary school was required at Wilson Street, noting that school officials and Superintendent Coakley preferred a new facility. Rodgers cautioned the committee that public debate was inevitable regardless of the final decision, stating, “…you’re going to have an argument no matter what you decide upon.”

In addition to scheduling the September conference, the committee voted unanimously to recommend adding a cafetorium to the Balch School, and reviewed the establishment of a new school district encompassing the Rustic Acres development and a section of Westover.

Archival Note: This article has been dynamically reconstructed from the original public record print archives of the Patriot Ledger

More…

  • Officials Weighing School Repair Cost-March 6, 1971

    Selectmen last night favored start on work to secure walls of the fire-gutted third story of Norwood Junior High School South which are still standing after a section of the rear wall collapsed Thursday. Architect’s Proposal The local architectural firm of Korslund, LeNormand and Quann, Inc., which directed the construction of the temporary roof damaged…

  • Work Under Way At Junior High North-May 29, 1970

    In 1970, Norwood Junior High North saw new fencing, repaving, and drainage improvements while a major school facilities survey moved toward completion, shaping long‑term planning.

  • Norwood Kills Funds For School Addition-June 26, 1969

    Voters approve a $1,000 Endean Park drainage compromise and reverse a zoning rule to relocate Carl A. Johnson’s Norwood Cadillac Co. along Route 1.

    Open ledger titled County Ledger 1969 with budget requests marked 'Budget Cut' and a judge's gavel on a wooden desk
  • Permanent Building Committee Unveils High School Addition Cost Estimates-June 13, 1969

    Finance Commission Reviews Extensive School Expansion Proposals Ahead of Critical Monday Town Meeting Warrant Meeting late last night with the Finance Commission (FinCom), the Permanent Building Construction Committee formally quoted detailed cost estimates regarding the highly anticipated Norwood High School addition project. The comprehensive structural estimates are being prepared for immediate presentation to town representatives,…

  • Willett School Wiring Dispute Adds $9,000 to Construction Costs Ahead of September Opening-July 28, 1968

    ⠀ The Norwood Permanent Building Construction Committee last night voted to approve the installation of additional circuit breaker panels so that the Willett School can open on schedule in September. The cost of the electrical installation is estimated at approximately $9,000. William J. Kates, supervisor of the Municipal Light Department and inspector of wires, advised…

  • Ground Broken for $1.23 Million George F. Willett Elementary School-August 11, 1967

    Following a $1.04 million contract award and emergency state borrowing approval, Rocheford Construction Co. broke ground on the 16-classroom George F. Willett Elementary School.

  • Local Firm Designing Additions To Balch & Cleveland Schools-August 5, 1964

    This Day In Norwood History-August 5, 1964-Local Firm Designing Both School Additions

  • Oldham School Drainage Repairs Scheduled For Completion-June 24, 1964

    Corrective Measures Target Long-Standing Controversy At Elementary Site Corrective measures designed to resolve persisting drainage problems at the Oldham Elementary School are scheduled to be completed by the end of this week. The ongoing drainage difficulties at the new school site had been the subject of a long controversy in discussions of the Oldham School…

  • School Building Committee Votes to Recommend Addition to Cleveland School-August 16, 1963

    By a 3-2 vote, Norwood’s Elementary School Building Committee recommended an eight-room addition to the Cleveland School rather than constructing a new facility on Wilson Street.

  • School Committee Considers New School Sites-March 22, 1962

    NORWOOD, Mar, 22 -Arthur B. Rodgers, chairman of the School Housing Study Committee which is responsible for the long-range projection of the towns future school needs, has requested information from the School Committee on its plans for new schools. Being considered by the School Committee are the possibilities of the construction of a second junior…


Discover more from Norwood Historical Society

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.