The School Committee voted last night to formally request a legal ruling from Town Counsel regarding the application of the state Open Meeting Law to all town committees and boards when deliberating the upcoming 1964 municipal budget.
Motion for Broad Transparency Sparks Debate
The motion was introduced by committee member Francis X. Sheehan and seconded by Joseph F. Curran. It ultimately secured majority approval when Chairman Thomas A. White broke a tie vote, with committee member Joseph R. Olsham also supporting the measure.
However, three members—Mary Hemman, John J. Cavanaugh, and Henry W. Diggs—opposed the motion in its broader scope, arguing that any clarification should apply exclusively to the School Committee rather than policing other municipal bodies.
Explaining his rationale, Sheehan noted that he intentionally phrased the motion to encompass all town boards because, “I feel we shouldn’t be the only committee to discuss the budget in open session if other boards decide not to.” Sheehan reflected that many financial items previously handled in closed executive sessions ought to have been open to the public. “If we are going to give the public what they are entitled to under the law, all other boards should do the same,” Sheehan stated.
Lessons from Past Budget Battles
Chairman White and Curran concurred, pointing to the intense friction and public criticism encountered during the previous year’s budget cycle. In 1962, the School Committee conducted the vast majority of its budget deliberations behind closed doors. That secrecy triggered fierce opposition and hostile criticism from town meeting members across six grueling sessions, resulting in lengthy haggling before funds were finally approved.
“I think we made one big error last year in not making the townspeople aware of what we were trying to accomplish,” Chairman White stated. “I’m sure that any of the 27,000 people in Norwood would have acted as we did. But we presented a budget at the finance commission hearing without any obvious steps along the way.”
Curran, serving his inaugural year on the panel, added that his harrowing introduction to town meeting scrutiny convinced him of the necessity of transparency: “after being exposed to the town meeting last year,” he fully favored making budget items accessible to the public.
Conversely, Cavanaugh expressed concern that dragging other boards into the Town Counsel’s ruling would unfairly thrust the School Committee into the role of a political “whipping boy.” Undeterred, Olshan remarked that he was perfectly willing to “be a whipping boy in this instance.”
Archival Note: This article has been dynamically reconstructed from the original public record print archives of the Patriot Ledger
More…
-
Frank B. Boyden Not Compelled to Send Son to Public School-This Day In Norwood History-January 17, 1910
DECIDES FOR FATHER. Action Brought by Norwood Committee Against Frank B. Boyden. Can the Norwood School committee compel Frank E. Boyden, the 12-year-old son of Frank B. Boyden of Pleasant st, to attend school, and if it can, should it oblige Mr. and Mrs. Boyden to send the boy to the public schools, was left…
-
Letter To The Editor About School Board Nominee Cornelius Callahan-This Day In Norwood History-February 25, 1904
To the Editor of the Norwood Advertiser. Mr. Editor: I desire to call the attention of the voters of Norwood, to a few facts concerning C. M. Callahan, Esq., nominee for the school board. Mr. Callahan is a native of the town, a product of our public schools, and an energetic, and ambitious young man.…
-
Norwood Father Sues Town for $15,000 Because Proper Conveyance is Not Provided to School-This Day In Norwood History-November 22, 1895
WANTS HIS CHILDREN CARRIED. NORWOOD, Nov 22—This town is all in a ferment again over the so-called Gillin case. Away back in 1889 Rev George Hill, who was then chairman of the school board of Norwood, authorized Mr. James J. Gillon, who resides near the Dedham borderline and three miles from the nearest normal school…
-
John Gillin Wants Children Carried to School-This Day In Norwood History-January 8, 1895
Their Father Now Wants Damages Because Their Conveyance is Not Suitable. NORWOOD, Jan 8— Three suits, aggregating $15,000, have been brought by Mr. John Gillin, who resides in the Ellis district, against the town. Each suit is for $5000 and is brought as guardian for his three minor children for alleged damages, caused by the…
-
Should Norwood Hire a School Superintendent?-This Day in Norwood History-June 7, 1890
June 8, 1890- The question of hiring a superintendent was raised at a lively town meeting. The following March, town meeting, empowered Mr. Maurice J. O’Brien , principal of the Everett School, to act in the capacity of Norwood’s first superintendent of schools.
-
Celebration of the Incorporation of the Town of Norwood-This Day In Norwood History-March 6, 1872
NORWOOD THE VICINITY OF BOSTON. The New Town or Norwood. The inhabitants of this new town, which formerly has been known as South Dedham, last evening celebrated the formal incorporation of the town; Messrs. George Winslow, Isaac Colburn, J. Edward Everett, Elijah Wheeloek, George H. Morrill, George B. Talbot, J. Metcalf Baker, J. Warren Talbot,…
Discover more from Norwood Historical Society
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.